Papers and podcasts
24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is rapidly evolving. The following is a list of the key publications in the field, literature involving 24sure and links to podcasts of interest.
Please also download our 24sure publication booklet, or contact us for a print version.
To help navigate through the publications please use the links below:
Aneuploidy PGS in polar body (24,21,13,12,2) or trophectoderm biopsy (19,6)
Translocation PGD in polar body (15,3), blastomere biopsy (23,20) or trophectoderm biopsy (25,15)
Validation of 24sure technology in polar body (11,10), blastomere biopsy (22,17,8,4) or trophectoderm biopsy (18,16,14,9,7,5)
Assessment of 19,803 paired chromosomes and clinical outcome from first 150 cycles using array CGH of the first polar body for embryo selection and transfer
Fishel S, Craig A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Jenner L, Cater E, Brown A, Gordon A, Thornton S, Campbell A, Berrisford K, Kellam L, Sedler M.
J Fertiliz In Vitro 2011 1:101
- This paper from CARE Fertility group, led by Simon Fishel, presents their experience of using 24sure on polar bodies since 2008 when they first assessed arrayCGH aneuploidy screening and achieved a live birth following use of the technology, see below.
- They conclude that arrayCGH was proven to generate robust chromosome information and to generate improved implantation rates in women with very poor prognosis.
A review of PGS for IVF was recently published, written by the CARE Fertility Group in Nottingham.
A new era of PGS for IVF - will it yield the anticipated improved efficiency?
Fishel, S., Thornton, S., Dowell, K.
J. Fertiliz In Vitro 2011, 1:1
There were a large number of presentations and posters that used 24sure at the ASRM 2011 meeting held in Orlando in October 2011. This collection of work really shows the impact on outcomes following aneuploidy screening. Abstracts from the meeting are published in Fertility and sterility. Some of these talks are available to view at www.cytochip.com/presentations (log in required).
[O-74] FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously arrayCGH screened blastocysts reveals high accuracy of diagnosis and no sign of mosaicism or preferential allocation. A. Capalbo et al.
[O-76] Significant decrease in miscarriages after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for recurrent pregnancy loss using array comparative genome hybridization (arrayCGH). J. Grifo, et al.
[O-83] 24 chromsome analysis of products of conception specimens by arrayCGH allows for more results than conventional karyotyping and allows for simultaneous maternal cell contaminations analysis. J. Sanchez, et al.
[O-88] Are patients undergoing PGD for chromosome rearrangements at increased risk of aneuploidy affecting chromosomes unrelated to their rearrangement (interchromosomal effect)?
S. Alfarawati et al.
[O-183] Implantation of euploid blastocysts, assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), in unstimulated cycles is not correlated with maternal age.
G. Harton, et al.
[O-198] Efficiency of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using arrayCGH compared to matched control IVF patient populations with and without day 3 PGS FISH.
A. Capalbo, et al.
[O-205] Chromosome breakage in oocytes and embryos: assessment of frequency, origin and clinical relevance of genetic instability during preimplantation development
D. Wells, et al.
[O-209] The progress of chromosome abnormalities from meiosis to the blastocyst stage.
E. Fragouli, et al.
[P-396] PGD via array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) can be used for any translocation to simultaneously detect unbalanced embryos and aneuploidy. P. Colls, et al.
[P-406] Chromosomal mosaicism in day 3 embryos from young, successful art patients as determined by array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). L. J. Wilton, Preimplantation Genetics, Melbourne IVF
[P-473] Analysis of 4795 day 3 embryos by array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH): aneuploidy patterns. S. Munne, etal. Reprogenetics, Livingston, NJ
Two papers were recently published that included data from the ESHRE PGS taskforce proof of principle trial - currently free full text articles.
Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results
Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Handyside A, Staessen C, Harper J, Schmutzler A, Collins J, Goossens V, van der Ven H, Vesela K, Gianaroli L.
Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep 15. [Epub ahead of print]
Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects.
Magli MC, Montag M, Köster M, Muzi L, Geraedts J, Collins J, Goossens V, Handyside AH, Harper J, Repping S, Schmutzler A, Vesela K, Gianaroli L.
Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep 9. [Epub ahead of print]
ESHRE's publication 'Focus on Reproduction', September issue, is an interesting read with a number of references to the upcoming polar body arrayCGH RCT trial and 24sure. Click here to download the issue, check out pages 12,32 and 34.
A number of abstracts and posters presented at the recent ESHRE 2011 conference in Stockholm used 24sure and 24sure related products. The abstract book is available for download from the ESHRE website.
O-250 PGD for translocations using array comparative genome hybridization. P. Colls et al., Reprogenetcs, Livingston, USA.
P-407 Maternal meiosis 1 errors detected by array comparative genomic hybridisation of first polar bodies correlate with poor embryo quality. C.S. Ottolini et al., University of Kent, University of Leeds and The Bridge Centre, London, UK.
P-430 Clinical application of array comparative genomic hybridization in preimplantation genetic diagnosis for reciprocal and robertsonian translocations. F. Fiorentino et al., Genoma, Rome, Italy
P-432 Successful clinical application of arrayCGH for 24 chromosome aneuploidy on day 3 preimplantation embryos: high efficiency and reliability. L. Rodrigo et al., Institut Universitari - IVI Valencia, Spain.
Array comparative genomic hybridisation on first polar bodies suggests that non-disjunction is not the predominant mechanism leading to aneuploidy in humans
Gabriel AS, Thornhill AR, Ottolini CS, Gordon A, Brown AP, Taylor J, Bennett K, Handyside A, Griffin DK
J Med Genet. 2011 Jul;48(7):433-7. Epub 2011 May 26.
- Here the question of whether aneuploidy arises from non-disjunction (whole chromosome segregation errors) or through precocious separation (sister chromatid segregation errors) is addressed with the use of 24sure.
- They conclude that most anueploidy arises from sister chromatid separation errors (92% vs 8%).
PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization
Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iammarrone E, Gordon A, Pantos K.
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1925-35. Epub 2011 Apr 12
- This paper uses 24sure+ to detect translocations in day 3 embryos, balanced embryos were then selected for transfer on day 5 of the same cycle. Of 200 embryos analysed from 24 couples, 93.5% were successfully diagnosed. 16% of embryos were found to be normal/balanced for all chromosomes, 17.1% had the translocation and normal for aneuploidy on other chromosomes, 39.6% had the translocation and anueploidy, 27.3% were normal or balanced for the expected translocation, but had aneuploidy on other chromosomes.
- Embryos suitable for transfer were identified in 17 cycles (60.7%). 12 couples achieved clinical pregnancy (70.6% per embryo transfer) with a total of 14 embryos implanted (63.6% per transferred embryo).
A number of abstracts and posters presented at the recent PCRS conference in Palm Springs used 24sure and 24sure related products. Abstracts from the meeting are published by Fertility and Sterility (vol 94(4) S1).
O-6 Implantation and miscarriage rates following arrayCGH analysis at the cleavage and blastocyst stages. G. Harton et al.
P-35 Reanalysis of monosomic embryos at the blastocyst stage following day 3 biopsy and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). P. Colls et al.
P-36 Aneuploidy patterns in 3143 day-3 embryos analyzed by array CGH. S. Munne et al.
P-42 Trophectoderm cells derived from blastocyst biopsy are suitable for array CGH analysis of 24 chromosomes. Z. Yang et al.
First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. Human Reprod. 2011 Jun;26(6):1560-74. Epub 2011 Mar 29 This poster from MGZ in Munich uses 24sure and 24sure+ and was presented at the GfH meeting in Regensburg March 2011. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis - Array-CGH of pluripotent trophoblast cells after trophectoderm biopsy. Koehler et al. A number of abstracts and posters presented at the recent Fertility conference in Dublin used 24sure and 24sure related products. Can first polar body array CGH results predict developmental potential. Cater et al, CARE fertility Developmental potential of embryos derived from oocytes found to have a single aneuploidy in the first polar body. Cater et al, CARE fertility Oocyte chromosome complement does not appear to be a factor in fertilisation– a comparison of first polar body analysis of fertilised and unfertilised metaphase II oocytes. Lynch et al, CARE fertility Application of aCGH for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosome rearrangements and additional unrelated chromosome aneuploidy. Lynch et al, CARE fertilty Trophectoderm biopsy and array CGH to detect unbalanced forms of t(9;15)(q22.2;q11.1) after failed FISH. Lynch et al, CARE fertility Multiple Factor PGD – Diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy and translocation status, HLA type and Fanconi Anaemia Type A in a single blastomere. Lynch et al, CARE fertilty Comprehensive characterization of chromosome abnormalities in human blastocysts. Alfarawati et al, Reprogenetics, UK High implantation, pregnancy and birth rates after comprehensive chromosomal screening of blastocysts. Wells et al, Reprogenetics, UK Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall N, Mania A, Griffiths T, Gordon A, Wells D. Human Reproduction. 2011 Feb;26(2):480-90. Epub 2010 Dec 8 IVF podcasts is an excellent website that has a collection of short audio and video presentations, including interviews, demonstrations and lectures. The embryo biopsy technique demonstration is particularly enlightening. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-García J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munné S. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):953-8. Epub 2010 Oct 25 New ESHRE PGD guidelines ESHRE PGD consortium Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct 21 Four guidelines include one outlining PGD centre organisation and three relating to the methods used: amplification-based
testing, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)-based testing and polar body/embryo biopsy. Karyomapping:
a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on
mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA, Griffin DK J Med Genet. 2010 Oct;47(10):651-8. Epub 2009 Oct 25 Combined Translocation and Aneuploidy-Screening after Polar Body Biopsy and Array-CGH Kombinierte Translokations- und Aneuploidieuntersuchungen nach Polkörperbiopsie und array-Comparative Genomic
Hybridisation Montag M, Köster K, van der Ven K, Bohlen U, Bender F J. Reproduktionsmed. Endokrinol 2010; 7 (6), 498-502 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis after 20 years Alan H Handyside Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Sep;21(3):280-2. Epub 2010 Jul 21 Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes Munné S, Wells D, Cohen J. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul; 94(2):408-30. Epub 2009 May 5 What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Geraedts J, Goossens V,
Harton G, Moutou C, Pehlivan Budak T, Renwick P, Sengupta S,
Traeger-Synodinos J, Vesela K. Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):821-3. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, Goossens V, Handyside A, Harper J, Montag M, Repping S, Schmutzler A. Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):575-7. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Kelada E, Thornton S, Jenner L, Cater E, Brown A, Garcia-Bernardo J. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):1006.e7-1006.e10. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Genetic analysis of human embryos by metaphase comparative genomic
hybridization (mCGH) improves efficiency of IVF by increasing embryo
implantation rate and reducing multiple pregnancies and spontaneous
miscarriages. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Maassarani G, Tortoriello D,
Brody S. Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):1886-94. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D. Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1700-6. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Polar Body Diagnosis – A Step in the Right Direction? Katrin van der Ven, Markus Montag, and Hans van der Ven. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, March 2008 105(11): 190-196 Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH Dagan Wells, Samer Alfarawati and Elpida Fragouli Molecular Human Reproduction Vol.14, No.12 pp. 703–710, 2008 Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening Ali Hellani, Khaled Abu-Amero, Joseph Azouri, Siham El-Akoum Vol 17 No 6. 2008 841-847 Reproductive BioMedicine Online Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K, De Rycke M, Thienpont B, Debrock S,
Staessen C, Moreau Y, Fryns JP, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Vermeesch
JR Vol 34 No 9. May 2006 e68 Nucleic Acids Res.
van der Ven H